Sept 2009

March 2009

Note from Kathleen Moore

---

The most important issue in our Freedom Movement- Personhood

oh canada,

our bought and sold out land

true corporate love

and all our banks command

with glowing hearts

we see thee fall

from true morality

from far and wide

oh canada,

we've lost our sovereignty

god keep our land

hopefully debt free

oh canada we have no dignity

oh canada whats left to stand for thee

Virtually every city in Canada is a corporation, yet no one offers a word of complaint.

Corporation called CANADA

CANADIAN Corporate Inquiries

CANADIAN Corporate Inquiries

 

With everyone on the latest, CANADA is a corporation argument, I felt it time to add a couple

of comments on this issue.

 

Virtually every city in Canada is a corporation, yet no one offers a word of complaint. Indeed, many

people seem to take great pride in this fact especially for smaller cities and towns. Why is everyone

so up in arms about there being a corporation called CANADA and not about their own cities? We

have much more power to unincorporate our local cities and towns than CANADA registered in

Washington, yet no one has even made any attempt to so do.

 

CANADA is, it appears, registered as a corporation in Washington. I have found no evidence that there

is a company called CANADA registered in Canada. It does not appear that CANADA is a publically traded

corporation, where someone with enough money can simply buy up the company and run our country

from a foreign nation for example. (Remembering of course that he who has the gold make the rules - ie:

 

Although CANADA is registered with the US Securities Commission, what is the effect of this? Does anyone

truly know, as opposed to hypothesis?  Is it registered there only for purposes of raising monies on the

foreign exchange markets?  Remember too, that the Canadian Parliament has always been considered as a

body politic, similar if not identical to a corporation in that it exists independent of its members, who could

be voted out the next day, yet Parliament still remains and functions. Apparently many other countries are also

so registered, though admittedly this does not alter the nature and effect of CANADA being so registered.

 

Is this purported incorporation of CANADA upon the U.S. Securities Commission proof that CANADA is a

corporation in relation to all home and foreign based activities?  Would CANADA not have to be registered

 

Being registered with the U.S. Securities Commission however does not, I believe, award the U.S. Government

any power and control over Canada anymore that than it does over any other Canadian based company, though

Canada would have to comply with the rules of the Securities Commission as much as every other corporation

and entity registered therewith and same as joining any other 'group' to speak allegorally.

 

Most importantly, does the fact that Canada has decided to set up a corporation called CANADA in the U.S.

Securities Commission, automatically mean that our Parliament is this corporation? Or the Government of Canada?

Could Parliament or the Gov't not create 1000 companies?  Does this mean that Parliament is actually this

corporation?  Is there any evidence that this corporation is what actually runs the country, as opposed to Parliament

itself?  This situation may be no different than myself being leader of an unincorporated city and setting up various

corporations in the exercise of my power.  Does so doing actually make the corporation running the city?

Or city council?  Or are these simply corporations set up to better permit ME to so do? (subjectively speaking of

course)

 

In either case, is this not simply a 'confirmation' if I may use that term, of the body politic or body corporate structure

that has already been in place for hundreds of years even into English Parliamentary history which views their

Parliamentary structure in this same manner? 

Although Parliament is somewhat run in the manner of a corporation, existing as it does in the legal fiction world, year

after year, notwithstanding who its members are, what evidence do we have that Parliament is actually this corporation?

I don't believe Parliament can be incorporated in this manner. 

 

The government of Canada however may be different, bearing in mind that we have a new gov't every 4 years, but this

does not render our country (admittedly de facto) without a gov't for any period of time, it too simply continues. However,

again, is the Gov't of Canada (as opposed to Parliament) actually this Securities Commission corporation called CANADA for purposes of running the country and controlling our destiny, or simply the controlling

mind who has created this corporation called CANADA for purposes of raising funds in the Commission, to permit Canada

I thank those who recently discovered more information on this issue and I have forwarded this to the Canadian

Government in support of my previous Access to Information Request demanding information and documentation

on this issue. Their original report was somewhat vague and non-responsive - especially in light of this most recent

evidence. They basically took the position that Canada was simply registered as a foreign government to

"support borrowing undertakings".  They admitted to the existence of the prospectus that was recently sent

around on the net as well, though they did not provide it as I demanded. I now have it thanks to Sam and a few

others who were kind enough to send the link out to their list.

 

As everyone who knows me will admit, I don't like conclusions based upon want of information. We need more information

as to how and why this corporation was set up - and most imporantly, its relation to our actual governing structure.  We need to know if Canada is actually a corporation as opposed to the Gov't of Canada actually creating a corporation to do work for it in a certain area, ie: the corporation responds to the Gov't, the corporation is not in control of the Gov't.  Does anyone have time to search through Hansards circa 1933 when this corporation was apparently set up for any comments that may have been made?

I will keep everyone in the loop when I receive word back from my latest Access Request. There are many questions left

unanswered, more than I have referenced above. Let's get these answers first, prior to making conclusions and spreading

what may be false information, and which only lowers our credibility for all of us.  Far too many people have simply jumped on this issue assuming certain conclusions - actions which have been demonstrably shown to be erroneous upon many other issues.

 

I have no evidence BTW, that any of the provinces are incorporated and was wondering if anyone else does?

 

in freedom I remain,

David-Kevin: Lindsay

 

---

 

 The Common Law Education and Rights Initiative

    proudly presents:

David-Kevin: Lindsay

Legal Personality and the ITA

The most comprehensive and documented analysis of

personhood in Canadian freedom history!  

Yes, being a “person” is voluntary! 

To BETTER protect your life, liberty and property, you will learn:

 The SCC rules property is a constitutional right!

YES! Income tax is voluntary!

Being a “person” exists prior to the birth certificate.

The legal definition of a “person” and “natural person”. How you become, and can avoid being a “person”.

The ‘formula’ at law to be a “person”.

Your voluntary right to be a “person” is protected by the Coronation Oath and Constitutional promises of HMTQ!

The judiciary finally agrees – see actual proof that:

fonts (ALL CAPS, I, B) DO differentiate between a man and a “person” – for over 100 years!

LOCATION:   Sapperton Hall,   418 Keary St.  New Westminster, B.C.    

DATE: Sat. April 4, 2009                              

Sandman Hotel,  2130 Harvey St., Kelowna, B.C.                

DATE: Sat. April 18, 2009

Sandman Hotel,  939 Burnaby Ave., Penticton, B.C.           

DATE: Sun. April 19, 2009

 

TIME:                   9:30 a.m. sharp – 6:00 p.m. (approx.) including Q and A  

COST: $99/day

More dates to be announced shortly!

 

Pre-register now!   taxesarevoluntary@gmail.com  

-- and --   

Don’t forget to bring a friend!

Visit the C.L.E.A.R. Literature Table

---

MEDIA RELEASE

KELOWNA, BC (March 11 2009) – Bill C-6 and the 2004 Natural Health Products “drug style” regulations has hundreds of Concerned Consumers Expected to Attend Natural Health Products Public Meeting, March 16th, in Kelowna.

While many in the natural health product (NHP) industry are wondering how the January 1, 2010, deadline for product applications and approvals will affect them, Shawn Buckley, LLB, will be presenting a talk on how government regulations, developed for “safety and security”, may cause more harm than the products themselves.

Bill C51 may have mobilized the industry, but the true issues, which Buckley will address, run deeper and include problems with our existing regulations, which are affecting consumer health freedoms and are poised to limit access to NHPs. As with Bill C51, Buckley will explain why Canadians have reason to be concerned over Bill C-6.

Buckley, a constitutional lawyer well-versed in regulatory matters, is also president of the Natural Health Products Protection Association (NHPPA), which launched the Charter of Health Freedom on September 10, 2008.

The Charter (charterofhealthfreedom.org) is being supported across Canada by a broad cross-section of Canadians—consumers/citizens, NHP manufacturers, retailers and wholesalers, natural health practitioners from many disciplines and cultures and NGOs. More than 10,000 signatures have been gathered on petitions, and national efforts continue.

Last June, Buckley spoke in Vancouver before a crowd of 500 people, and again early February. He discusses how the Charter, if passed, would affect our health system and the existing NHP industry. This event will also cover:

• Corporate influence on Health Canada and the FDA

• The results of a recent court case ruling, which sets a precedent for many NHPs to become re-classified as available only through prescription.

• Why Canadians should be concerned about Bill C-6

When: Monday, March 16, 7:00 pm (doors open at 6:00 pm)

Where: KLO Theatre, Student Service Building, 1000 KLO Rd, Kelowna (free parking)

Admission: $5 at the door OR FREE for members of Health Action Network Society who show a valid membership card at the door

For more information and/or complimentary media passes, please contact Rose (250) 868-9972 in Kelowna or Tiffany at the Natural Health Products Protection Association (250) 377-4930. This event is not associated with the Okanagan College.